in Houston, Texas
Will Texas seal off public access to state workers' home addresses?
Friday, Dec 19, 2008, 02:06PM CST
By Jennifer Peebles
Should public employees' home addresses be public record?

Texas Watchdog says yes. But a state lawmaker has pre-filed a bill for the upcoming legislative session that looks like it would make state workers' home addresses, and other information, confidential.

Public employees don't like us journalists snooping in their businesses, knowing where they live or their phone numbers. It's a sensitive subject, we know -- when we published an online database of pay records for state workers making $100K and up earlier this week, we specifically noted that we didn't ask the state for the state workers' home addresses.

We didn't need workers' home addresses to post those pay records. But I can foresee many legitimate stories about state government where reporters would need workers' home addresses. Home addresses are often the only way to verify that the John Smith who gave money to Mayor Doe's re-election campaign is also the John Smith who then got promoted into a big cushy city job.

I know this from personal experience, because I was an editor on a story at my old paper (not in Texas) in which state workers' home addresses were crucial to showing how promotions were being given to those who gave big bucks to the governor's campaign. Not only were state workers giving money -- the maximum amount allowed by state law -- but contributions were also being made in the names of their wives, parents and siblings, connections that we could not have made without address records.

I've just been quickly reading over Senate Bill 331, and it looks to me like it would generally close off public access to government employees and government officials' home addresses and home telephone numbers.

Looks to me like the rejiggered subsection B of Section 552.024 would allow the records to be open only if the employee/official "request(s) in writing that the main personnel office of the government body open access" -- changing the law from an opt-out setup to an opt-in setup.

As a journalist, I think we can safely predict that very few government workers are going to want to write a letter demanding their records be made public to anyone who wants to see them.

But there has to be a check on government, and that check is us.


Keep up with all the latest news from Texas Watchdog. Fan our page on Facebook, join our group on MySpace, follow us on Twitter, fan us on Digg, join our network on de.licio.us, and put our RSS feed in your newsreader. We're also on NewsVine, tumblr, FriendFeed and YouTube.
Comments
Be the first to post a comment.
Tweets
Peter Corbett  | 31 min 31 sec
I'm at Bethesda Bagels (1718 Connecticut Ave. NW, btwn S & R Sts. NW, Washington) http://t.co/aFtJk6L8
Peter Corbett  | 34 min 25 sec
Up early. Going in @NBCwashington @ 9am with @angiegoff to talk about @smwwdc
offthekuff | 39 min 19 sec
New OTK post HISD Board renews Grier’s contract: It was not unanimous. The Houston school board on Thursday exte... http://t.co/hEejMnrL
KFDA NewsChannel10 | 42 min 57 sec
Want to get paid for surfing the Web? Then join Google’s Screenwise project http://t.co/hQKtabot
Christine Irizarry | 1 hour 2 min
Churches are exempt from having to provide unemployment insurance. But I guess that doesn't apply to big hospitals run by religious orgs??
lstexasnews | 1 hour 5 min
No smokes at UT? http://t.co/bxWuS2CP
© 2012 TEXAS WATCHDOG and USELABS. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement