in Houston, Texas
Austin utility district party to voting rights case to be decided by Supreme Court
Fri Jan 9 23:05:56 2009 CST
By Lee Ann O'Neal
An Austin utility district is the plaintiff in a case challenging a section of the Voting Rights Act. The case will be decided by the Supreme Court. NYTimes.com has the story:
The case concerns the requirement in Section 5 of the law that certain state and local governments, mostly in the South, must obtain permission, or “preclearance,” from the Justice Department or a federal court before making changes that affect voting. ...

The lawsuit challenging the requirement was brought by a municipal utility district in Austin, Tex., established on undeveloped land there in the late 1980s. The district said it had never been accused of voting discrimination and should not be made to seek federal permission to, say, move the location of polling places or consolidate voting for its five-member board with the larger county ballot.

Here's a take by The Christian Science Monitor and one by USA Today, which says the court will hear the case in April.
Comments
Be the first to post a comment.
Tweets
Christina Wilks | 1 min 1 sec
Yes, I'm easily amused
Christina Wilks | 1 min 7 sec
due to a detour by the house, found a back way into the neighborhood! I'm learnin my new area! Hehehehehe
Nancy Zambrano | 1 min 32 sec
After a string of recent home burglaries Cedar Park PD is taking proactive steps to warn residents. Details at 5 & 9 on #Fox7
Austin Statesman | 1 min 35 sec
Our critics' picks for SXSW tonight: http://bit.ly/dA0dfQ Also, check out the side parties database: http://bit.ly/d1X8dN
Erinn Hall | 1 min 43 sec
How HC Reform Will Help People w/Disabilities http://bit.ly/cILYNi (via @Disabilitygov) -no more denying kids 4 pre-existing conditions
John Wonderlich | 1 min 48 sec
obama calls for time-sensitive disclosure of public information, referring to subsidies. in 1998. http://bit.ly/djRk0c (minute 40)
© 2010 Texas Watchdog and Use Labs. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement