in Houston, Texas
Houston Chronicle: Lawsuit to force Houston redistricting dismissed by federal judge
Thursday, May 28, 2009, 07:00AM CST
By Ann Raber
Houston won't be forced to redraw city council districts before the 2010 census, even though the city's population has increased enough to warrant that action by law. The Houston Chronicle's Bradley Olson reports that the lawsuit filed by Port of Houston commissioner Vidal Martinez and former City Councilman Carroll Robinson did not prevail at the courthouse this week:

The lawsuit argued the city was violating its own charter by refusing to redistrict and add two council districts when its population passed the 2.1 million threshhold in late 2006.


U.S. District Judge Sim Lake rejected that contention, finding the plaintiffs had failed to show the city’s charter compelled redistricting. Martinez promised an appeal.



And so the size and makeup of the Houston City Council and its district boundaries will be revisited after the next nationwide census.


In February, the city council voted to postpone redistricting until 2010. Mayor Bill White drew some criticism from people who said the issue of district lines and representation should be taken up in sooner, especially since the city's estimated headcount had passed 2.1 million in 2006. But that citywide estimate does not drill down to the precinct level, and detailed 2000 numbers were viewed by city officials as being too old to rely on.



Federal District Judge Sim Lake's decision hinged on the need for an official, accurate count of the population and demographic information to dismiss the case was based on the plaintiffs' failure to prove that their rights under federal statutes and the Constitution had been violated.

From the Chronicle:




City Attorney Arturo Michel said the ruling upholds the city’s contention that it could not follow federal law regarding redistricting without the accuracy provided by the upcoming decennial population count by the U.S. Census Bureau. Federal law requires precinct-level data for redistricting, which would not be available until after the 2010 count. Using data from the 2000 count, the city argued, would lead to inaccurate district boundaries.



White's office issued a statement in response to the judge's decision.




City officials have fielded a lot of criticism; but, Judge Lake’s ruling confirms that the decision to wait until we get the best available data is most fair to voters.



See some primary source documents in the debate here.

Comments
kevin whited
Saturday, 05/30/2009 - 02:42PM

** The lawsuit argued the city was violating its own charter by refusing to redistrict and add two council districts when its population passed the 2.1 million threshhold in late 2006. **

Not exactly. Actually, not even close.

http://www.bloghouston.net/item/7660

** Federal District Judge Sim Lake’s decision hinged on the need for an official, accurate count of the population and demographic information. **

Not true. See previous link.

When there are primary docs available, it's ALWAYS a good idea to read them, instead of relying on another reporter's interpretation -- especially with regard to the Chronicle, where news staff is spread very thin these days.

Tweets
Ronald C. Green | 35 sec
RT @dbarlounge: YOU NEVER KNOW WHO WILL COME THRU DBAR TONIGHT
Houston Chronicle | 3 min 25 sec
Aldine ISD officer charged with abusing his wife http://t.co/2s0qybsP #hounews
Mindy McAdams | 3 min 36 sec
ASNE's "10 Best Practices for Social Media" - free PDF download. May 2011. http://t.co/QBdqi9I9
Clay Johnson | 4 min 39 sec
Following @acarvin is actual chaos thrown directly into your stream. enlightening but unsettling. Like carbonated bourbon.
Houston Chronicle | 10 min 34 sec
Child's foot amputated in crash after men fight http://t.co/6Gknlx5T
Texas Monthly | 13 min 13 sec
True or false. Whole Foods was bought by Monsanto? http://t.co/2vlrEhZK
© 2012 TEXAS WATCHDOG and USELABS. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement