in Houston, Texas
Public costs of wind power pile up as industry digs in against expiration of tax credit
Friday, Sep 14, 2012, 02:15PM CST
By Mark Lisheron
spanish fan

Imagine Washington policymakers one day proposing a spectacular renewable energy and jobs program, one that assigned a laborer equipped with a lovely Spanish-style but, of course, American-made, fan to every home.

The symmetrical logic of reducing our loathsome dependence on fossil fuels while creating more than 114 million jobs is powerfully alluring. If you could resist the impulse to ask what this revolutionary program would cost.

Something on a much less ridiculous scale has been going on for decades at the intersection of power generation and your government, which has insisted, through its policies, that American taxpayers support alternative energy sources like wind power.

To give you an idea of how competitive the wind power industry is, the possibility a federal production tax credit for wind farms might not be renewed for the first time since 1992 has sent companies in the nation’s wind power capital, Texas, into a panic, the Texas Tribune reports.

This in spite of the $7 billion state electric ratepayers contributed to build power lines from West Texas wind farms to cities where the power could actually be used. And that all of the taxpayer and ratepayer support produces a very small number of jobs at a cost of $1.6 million each.

Vestas, a Danish turbine manufacturer, is closing its Houston research and development facility in advance of the tax credit vote, the story says. William McWhirter with Trinity Industries in Dallas says a decline in wind tower production next year will hurt the manufacturing company.

Sarah Howell, a spokeswoman for BP Wind Energy, a creator of Texas wind farms, says the impact of a lapsed tax credit on the industry would be “devastating.”

Little remarked upon by the people opining in the story is how much supporting the wind power industry costs and that those costs have always been borne by taxpayers and ratepayers.

Without subsidy, the actual cost to generate wind power on-shore is expected to be at least 50 percent and as much as 75 percent more than for natural gas, according to projections made in a June 2011 study by the Electric Power Research Institute. (Please see projection charts on pages 1-11 and 1-12 in the study.)

Offshore wind power is expected to cost two to almost three times as much to produce as natural gas, the Research Institute study says. And those cost differences are not expected to change appreciably by 2025, the study says.

***

Contact Mark Lisheron at 512-299-2318 or mark@texaswatchdog.org or on Twitter at @marktxwatchdog.

Keep up with all the latest news from Texas Watchdog. Fan our page on Facebook, follow us on Twitter and Scribd, and fan us on YouTube. Join our network on de.licio.us, and put our RSS feeds in your newsreader. We're also on MySpace, Digg, FriendFeed, and tumblr.

Photo from ad by Lands Far Away Imports Inc.

Comments
Bruce
Saturday, 09/15/2012 - 07:03AM

Not sure where the author gets his costs from , but projections from the us dept of energy expect offshore wind power to drop by around 30% in the next 20yrs or so. Onshore wind is already at grid parity in several states. If support must be cut for onshore wind, it is a success story, not a failure, and it must be repeated offshore. The global offshore wind turbine market will dwarf every other manufacturing industry except cars within a few years. Nearly every industrial coastal nation in the world is diving in with Billions of dollars of public investment. We can join them, or continue burning up all our no renewable fuel

archaeopteryx
Tuesday, 09/18/2012 - 07:54AM

Wind power has been around since 1975 (the other energy crisis). Back then, the scare was about the imminent ice age. Since then, we warmed up, and wind power has failed to replace a SINGLE, conventional power plant, anywhere on the planet, including Germany or Denmark. Germany has in excess of 25GW of installed wind, with a capacity factor around 17% and contibution to electical supply of about 7%, and I srongly suspect (but cannot prove) that the actual fuel substitution is LESS than 7%, as these things require hot idle backup. The only measurements I am aware of are in the Falklands, where wind was advertized to save 40% of energy used, but was measured to save 4 to 8%, depending on the season. A Dutch report concluded that wind power replaces only 4% p.a., of its rated installed capacity. Denmark prides itself in many windmills, but gets its electricity from coal and heavy oil, dumps its wind power into the German and Norwegian grids and has the most expensive electricity in the EU. Money down a very deep and dark tube.

Tweets
Karen Townsend | 6 years 8 months
"Patrick F. Kennedy is a career foreign service officer" - http://t.co/GOrCe0IS
Peter Corbett ✈ | 6 years 8 months
I'm at McCarran International Airport (LAS) w/ @almacy http://t.co/KvmId07i
KERA Public Media | 6 years 8 months
TONIGHT at 7pm on KERA TV: Presidential Debate: Learn more at PBS NewsHour. http://t.co/Z9kYdun8
PBS MediaShift | 6 years 8 months
Tech Snafus Make Bill O'Reilly/Jon Stewart 'Rumble' More of a Stumble http://t.co/4OfeBlrG (@kegill | @pbsmediashift) #rumble2012
Will Sullivan | 6 years 8 months
Great addition, been burned too much by bad subs. "Google Play Announces Free Trials For In-App Subscription Services" http://t.co/TOLgRVak
TxDOT | 6 years 8 months
I-35W/North Tarrant Express #constantcontact http://t.co/QDzrQumu
© 2018 TEXAS WATCHDOG and USELABS. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement