Last month when the well-liked president of the University of North Texas, Gretchen Bataille, abruptly resigned, no one really knew why. That's kind of a problem.
When the leader of a publicly-funded university quickly departs without any explanation from anyone, we're left to concoct the worst-case scenario. Was there some sort of scandal? Was she forced out? Is the university in trouble? What role did Lee Jackson, the former Dallas County judge, now chancellor of the UNT system, play in Bataille's departure?
It's hard not to speculate in the absence of facts, and with UNT students in an uproar over the popular president's departure, the cone of silence could not stand forever.
Fortunately, Dallas Morning News reporters Holly Hacker and Candace Carlisle sorted through a treasure trove of documents, obtained through an public records request, that sheds light on why Bataille packed her bags. Turns out, Bataille and Jackson were mired in a bureaucratic power struggle over who was the Big Man/Woman on Campus. The two disagreed on everything from IT issues to tuition increases, while Jackson was prone to lecturingBataille as if she were a rebellious teenager.
"You are not authorized to relocate any of UNT's activities or course activities... until all of the necessary information about your plans has been provided to the System and you have received my written approval," he wrote her in a letter on Jan. 29.
Meanwhile, Bataille clearly chafed under Jackson's managerial style, passively-aggressively venting to her underlings that she had no sway over theUNT chancellor. E-mailing three IT specialists that Jackson hired a consulting firm with "an outcome in mind," she noted that she would recommend the three of them for a particular job, "but I imagine that my recommendationswouldn't be followed."
Ouch.
In the story, Bataille doesn't dispute that there was tension between her and Jackson: "Communication is a two-way street, and it takes two people to communicate."
For his part, Jackson, who came to UNT with no experience in higher education, merely offered a statement acknowledging that the two had irreconcilable differences.